Last blue highlight was a single tasks for comparison. Next 5 blue highlights show 4,5,6,7,8 concurrent tasks Second blue highlight shows 3 concurrent tasks. If the HD7950 is doing 5 then the S9100 finishes 30 seconds earlier.īasically no improvement after 5 concurrent work units with above driverįirst blue highlight shows 2 concurrent tasks. OpenCL: AMD/ATI GPU 0: ATI FirePro V (FireGL V) Graphics Adapter (driver version 1800.8 (VM), device version OpenCL 2.0 AMD-APP (1800.8), 12288MB, 12288MB available, 4219 GFLOPS peak)īasically my S9100 can do a little over 5 WU in the time it takes an HD7950 to do 4. Got effective cooling on my S9100 and results indicate a small improvement over HD7950 with the following driver: There is a list of compatibly motherboards for the w9xxx somewhere as I racall. Not all motherboard worked with my S9100. The mATX has on-board video so it will boot up unlike the S9100. I am guessing it was used for testing and then disabled. The board has a miniature Display Adapter hidden behind the vent but it did not function for me. Although a "Tahiti" class, it appear to required 2.0 OpenCl but a test I ran caused real problems with adjacent HD7950 when testing so the board will have to be in an old mATX motherboard all by itself. I am waiting on this cooling fan with shroud duct. I ran some tests and it seems to be 2x as good as HD7950 but it over heated and I did not want to do water cooling as there is more to the board than just the GPU.
AMD FIREPRO DRIVERS FOR LINUX FREE
I have an S9100 that I got fairly cheap, $300 free ship "new". There are statistics for that board here but I do not think it was optimized for multiple WUs as the times appear to be single Wu times.